Number of posts : 1485 Registration date : 2009-02-15 Age : 69 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:42 am
Make of this what you will and I am not endorsing this.
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:18 am
It reminds me of the dubious quote (that no one actually said!): "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me." Good enough for aliens too!
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:20 am
alj wrote:
Are there crop circles in China? I'm asking a serious question.
Ann
Considering the land mass, it would be very surprising if crop circles do not exist in China, Ann.
Now don't laugh. Promise? In the Chilbolton 'Arecibo message' Formation (in the above video) the message in the formation crop rectangle differed slightly from the original message that was sent out into space. The atomic numbers indicating the prevalent elements making up life on Earth have an additional value inserted into the binary sequence. This is precisely added in the correct location, and in the original binary code (therefore it can't be a mistake). Decoding from the crop formation, this additional element has an atomic number of 14 = Silicon.
-- a right chip off the old block. No, don't laugh.
alj Five Star Member
Number of posts : 9633 Registration date : 2008-12-05 Age : 80 Location : San Antonio
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:30 am
I'm not laughing.
Ann
alj Five Star Member
Number of posts : 9633 Registration date : 2008-12-05 Age : 80 Location : San Antonio
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:31 am
Shelagh wrote:
It reminds me of the dubious quote (that no one actually said!): "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me." Good enough for aliens too!
Do they speak King James, too?
Ann
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:37 am
No. Only Queen's English. They're all New Yorkers.
James Four Star Member
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:23 am
Knowledgeable people that perpetrate the man made formations myth are manifestly ignorant. They are more than ignorant
I used to farm hay and corn and would spread fertilizer and insecticide as needed as the crop grew. The tractor wheels would roll over a lot of the crop. But within hours the crop would begin to straighten and by the first rain there’d be no evidence of their being trampled.
Man made formations would similarly recover in days. Crop Circle Formations do not recover.
How long do you suppose the media has been covering that up?
Being willingly ignorant is stupid
James /
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:34 am
James wrote:
Knowledgeable people that perpetrate the man made formations myth are manifestly ignorant.
Editorial note: "people who ..." not "people that ..."
James Four Star Member
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:43 am
Shelagh
Quote :
Editorial note: "people who ..." not "people that ..."
WRONG
"That" is a word that is used in the English language for several grammatical purposes: * to introduce a restrictive clause * as a demonstrative pronoun * as a complementizer.
Not good Shelagh /
alice Five Star Member
Number of posts : 15672 Registration date : 2008-10-22 Age : 76 Location : Redmond, WA
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:01 am
Last edited by alice on Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:07 am; edited 2 times in total
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:03 am
James wrote:
How long do you suppose the media has been covering that up?
This article was posted in 2002 and it's still there. No cover-up:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A724204
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:09 am
James wrote:
Shelagh
Quote :
Editorial note: "people who ..." not "people that ..."
WRONG
"That" is a word that is used in the English language for several grammatical purposes: * to introduce a restrictive clause * as a demonstrative pronoun * as a complementizer.
Not good Shelagh /
Rule 1. Who refers to people. That and which refer to groups or things.
Examples: Anya is the one who rescued the bird.
She belongs to an organization that specializes in saving endangered species.
http://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/whoVwhVt.asp
James Four Star Member
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Shelagh
Quote :
This article was posted in 2002 and it's still there. No cover-up
WRONG
/
/ Caption reads This is probably 2 weeks of rest. /
Number of posts : 1485 Registration date : 2009-02-15 Age : 69 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:17 am
Shelagh wrote:
alj wrote:
Are there crop circles in China? I'm asking a serious question.
Ann
Considering the land mass, it would be very surprising if crop circles do not exist in China, Ann.
I would not be surprised to find that there were no crop circles in China seeing as the communist rule in that country is very strict I don't think the Aliens would risk ruining a paddy field.
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:17 am
Did the BBC page disappear? What a mystery!
Click on it again, James:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A724204
dmondeo Five Star Member
Number of posts : 1485 Registration date : 2009-02-15 Age : 69 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:31 am
Shelagh wrote:
James wrote:
How long do you suppose the media has been covering that up?
This article was posted in 2002 and it's still there. No cover-up:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A724204
I stand corrected Shelagh regarding no historical references I quote from the article you linked above: Crop circles are not a new phenomenon. There are 17th Century woodcuts that record the observation of what appears to be crop circles. One such woodcut, entitled The Devil Mower, appeared in a Hertfordshire newspaper dated 22 August, 1678. The article described the apparition overnight of a strange design in a field of oats, so neatly pressed that 'no mortal man was able to do the like' which was attributed to the 'devil or some infernal spirit'. By convoluted logic this apparition confirmed the existence of God since, it was argued, if devils have a Hell then there must be a Heaven, and a God.
Simple circles have appeared on farmland for generations. However, these enigmatic formations were often not reported since they were considered by country folk to be the result of natural causes, such as rutting deer, hedgehogs or crows feeding on ripened seed heads and trampling the crop in a ring. Circular damage has also been attributed to strange diseases, magic, fairies, and the intervention of demons. Consequently, silence was guaranteed either for fear of ridicule and ostracism from the community, or fear of losing a buyer for the crop. This situation probably holds true today, with many people afraid to come forward for similar reasons.
However, it is true that many farmers on whose land crop circles appear, rather than hush up and deny their existence, actually charge the public to access the site, thereby compensating for any damaged crops and possibly making a profit into the bargain.
You learn something every day. Pity they had no photography in the 17th century.
James Four Star Member
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:37 am
Wrong again Shelagh
First, "Knowledgeable people" is plural - hence a group (see your own post)
Secondly "that" can be used as a pronoun (see source below)
Quote :
That as a Pronoun
(text) But, of course, it is also more complicated than that. The who-goes-with-people rule is the conventional wisdom (1,2), but, on the other hand, I did find a credible reference that says otherwise.
I was shocked to see that my American Heritage Dictionary says, It is entirely acceptable to write either the man that wanted to talk to you, or the man who wanted to talk to you
Wow. So I dug around some more and found that there is a long history of writers using that as a relative pronoun when writing about people. Chaucer did it, for example
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:16 pm
Stepping down on a crop will break the crop stem and never affect the nodes
The stems in a Crop Formation are not affected - just the nodes are altered
Stupid is not knowing the difference between a stem and a node
James /
alice Five Star Member
Number of posts : 15672 Registration date : 2008-10-22 Age : 76 Location : Redmond, WA
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:39 pm
Last edited by alice on Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:05 am; edited 1 time in total
Shelagh Admin
Number of posts : 12662 Registration date : 2008-01-11 Location : UK
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:48 pm
James wrote:
Wrong again Shelagh
First, "Knowledgeable people" is plural - hence a group (see your own post)
Secondly "that" can be used as a pronoun (see source below)
Quote :
That as a Pronoun
(text) But, of course, it is also more complicated than that. The who-goes-with-people rule is the conventional wisdom (1,2), but, on the other hand, I did find a credible reference that says otherwise.
I was shocked to see that my American Heritage Dictionary says, It is entirely acceptable to write either the man that wanted to talk to you, or the man who wanted to talk to you
Wow. So I dug around some more and found that there is a long history of writers using that as a relative pronoun when writing about people. Chaucer did it, for example
At last an opportunity to talk about writing on a writers' forum!
"Knowledgeable people that perpetrate the man made formations myth are manifestly ignorant. They are more than ignorant." If "Knowledgeable people" is being referred to as a group, the use of "they" in the second sentence is inappropriate. A group is singular.
If "Knowledgeable people" is being referred to as a group, since a group is singular, the verb should be singular:
Knowledgeable people that perpetrates the man made formations myth is manifestly ignorant.
Clearly, although grammatically correct, the sentence would never be written that way. "Knowlegeable people" would be treated as plural and not as a singular group.
James Four Star Member
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:08 pm
Two sources say you are wrong. And I'd prefer to side with the American Heritage Dictionary and Chaucer.
So that you can join those that walk with confidence into a Circle, a stem looks like this ------------
And a node looks like this O
Now put them together and a healthy stalk will look like this ----O-------O-------O------
Now you are an expert on fake vs real.
Fake breaks the stem and real alters the node
EASY - welcome to the knowledgeable and well informed
James /
alj Five Star Member
Number of posts : 9633 Registration date : 2008-12-05 Age : 80 Location : San Antonio
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:29 pm
James:
Quote :
I'd prefer to side with the American Heritage Dictionary and Chaucer.
And this is the next paragraph from your source:
Quote :
So, it's more of a gray area than some people think, and if you have strong feelings about it, you could make an argument for using that when you're talking about people. But my guess is that most people who use who and that interchangeably do it because they don't know the difference. I don't consider myself a grammar snob-–this is “quick and dirty” grammar, after all-–but in this case, I have to take the side of the people who prefer the strict rule. To me, using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human. I always think of my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father. He was clearly trying to indicate his animosity and you wouldn't want to do that accidentally.
Do you begin to see what happens when you take something out of context?
As for Chaucer, he wrote in Middle English - a different language, used at a time before the Modern lEnglish language had been formalized.
Ann
James Four Star Member
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:22 pm
You are wrong Ann. More so than Shelagh.
1st) American Heritage Dictionary says, It is entirely acceptable to write either the man that wanted to talk to you, or the man who wanted to talk to you
2nd) "That" can be used as a demonstrative pronoun and is valid when the person is identified. I identified the person
Quote :
Knowledgeable people that perpetrate the man made formations myth are manifestly ignorant
3rd) there is a long history of writers using that as a relative pronoun when writing about people. Source http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/who-versus-that.aspx
The real problem Ann is that you don't seem to know the difference between a stem and a node / /
Abe F. March Five Star Member
Number of posts : 10768 Registration date : 2008-01-26 Age : 85 Location : Germany
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:39 pm
James, reading the interaction between you, Ann and Shelagh makes me wonder if thou knowest what thou doest. Challenging either Ann or Shelagh is dangerous. But both of them? It reminds me of the song, "know when to hold them, know when to fold them, know when to walk away, know when to run..." I suggest you lace up your running shoes.
James Four Star Member
Number of posts : 457 Registration date : 2010-10-14
Subject: Re: The truth about Crop Circles Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:53 am
Abe
Quote :
I suggest you lace up your running shoes.
James) When was it ever right to turn one’s back when there is a bit of adversity? And when was it ever right to cringe at the voice of a few?
And what level of IQ must one have when they can begin to tell the difference between a broken stem from the action of a board - and a stem with nodes that have been altered biologically?
Crop Circles are not restricted to England! This is a world wide experience - no one has granted anyone the right to stand in the way of discovery
Cringe if that is your way - but it doesn’t suit my tastes