Earthquake

Where is it?

I'll post a separate thread

I am waiting.

Well, as you find, the report to post on another thread. We will clarify our positions.

I know that construction is important. I know location is important.

You think there is a cover up as to the cause of an earthquake, I don't think so. Put your report anywhere, I am dying to see it.

Japan is located on several faults. They have numerous quakes. Well constructed houses, also. Sadly they have casualites, anyway.

Alice

Quote :

You think there is a cover up as to the cause of an earthquake

Dear Alice :: where have you read or heard this before?

Quote :

the moon is in a conservation of angular momentum agreement with the earth. If the earth’s rotation changes - the moon has no choice but to change its orbit.

You said it to Ahad.

Quit stalling, post your proof of your coverup allegations. I am getting impatient.

Are you writing the paper or what?

I am interested in earthquakes--not the moon. THE MOON IS OF NO CONCERN TO ME IN A COVER UP OF THE
CAUSE OF AN EARTHQUAKE. YOU ARE ALLEGING CRIMINAL INTENT.

Read what you are saying.

Quit threatening me with what NASA said. I am beginning to doubt they even wrote a report.

Just give me a link to it.

NO - IF THE MOON IS OF NO CONCERN NEITHER IS EARTHQUAKE

I WILL NOT POST IT - I DON'T LIKE YOUR ATTITUDE OR WORDS

Posted an update from Richard in Japan on the Current Events thread.

Ann

James,

Fine! As you wish. I suspected you had no report.

Since we reside on the earth and not the moon
and our home construction is here not there, I wished to stay focused on the earth.


To say that I fail to understand you would be an understatement. I hope you students did better in your classses. I was chairperson of a School board and a teacher with your attitude would have caused us major problems.

I can iimagine your classes--what an absolute nightmare.

Ann,

Thank you for your information about Richard.

James,

I am sorry I was offensive to you. I have no excuse, I am just a grouch. Thinking does change.

Forgive me.

James wrote:

I WILL NOT POST IT - I DON'T LIKE YOUR ATTITUDE OR WORDS

James, sometimes your attitude and words seem to be a bit peremptory. You do not seem to be willing to accept other perspectives as valid, and often insist that your point of view is the only correct point of view. When people disagree with you, you seem to be putting them down. When we have questions, you seem to feel threatened, and become antagonistic. And when that happens, we sometimes respond in kind.

Theories are just that, theories, and ought to be considered open for discussion, with each perspective given a voice. When you post a theory, your readers have a right to counter it, or ask for further clarification. That is the way open discussions work.

You cannot force anyone to accept your views, and bullying only makes things worse.

Just me.

Ann

I am sorry I blew up. I wanted answers, I got none.
I am still sorry I was mean.

Here you go, Alice, this is a link to Nasa's explanation of earthquakes:

http://scign.jpl.nasa.gov/learn/eq2.htm

You can search the Nasa website here:

http://search.nasa.gov/search/search.jsp?nasaInclude=earhquakes

Thank you, Shelagh.

At last.

Everyone is different. When I ask a question I love an answer to that question.and the sooner, the bettter.

Just me.

You and LC have a lot in common; no patience either of you. Me? Patience? Endless.

Shelagh,

Where did you get this endless patiience?

I should have been a lawyer. I could say "Just answer the question please."

For example, when I ask about the earth, the earth is what I wish to hear about --not a question about the moon?

Just me.

I can't claim credit for it, Alice; it's obviously in my genes. There are other personality traits I would have loved to inherit but no one gave me a list to choose from at conception. Makes you wonder what kind of people we would choose to be, given the choice, doesn't it?

Just the facts, ma'am.

Shelagh,

Great, timely answer--Thanks!

By the way, It seems to me that NASA holds to the conventional theory of earthquakes,
I saw nothing confirming James' ideas.

He is a clever man, though, when backed into a corner, he creates a diversion, then runs. he will be back as he is tenacious. I think he could apologize for his attitude towards Ann,, Al and Shelagh.

Just me again.

3/14/2011


This should make you smile, I just shot it this
morning ...

Cheers..Joe

Joe,

Leave it to you--you are delightful.

That is a wonderful photo, Joe!

Joe,

What kind of birds are they?
I saved them--they are so precious.

3/14/2011


I bought a new camera Kodak Z981 26X Zoom,
I don't have to get that close anymore, great
for wild life shots and scenery..


Cheers..Joe