Please tell me if this blog reads okay?

I would appreciate if you find this an easy or hard blog to read:

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=66837154&blogID=178580831

Of course I know everyone doesn't think this way... but is it okay to read from a layman's point of view? Does it 'sound' reasonable?

Ahad,
I cannot possibly critique the information you present, however it is most impressive and sounds logical. I think what you have presented is good. You create an interest in knowing more and then present it. The scientific information with formulas, etc., will most likely be passed over for those of us who can't comprehend them. Getting feed back, as you are attempting to do, where people have questions, will help in clarification.

Keep at it. You deserve more recognition for your work and eventually it will happen. Looking to the future is positive and you certainly have done that.
It reminds me of the intro to Star Trek where it says something like, "To go where no man has gone before, to seek new worlds...."
Your book has given me a better insight into what you are trying to convey. I recommend it highly.

I must agree with Abe.

I find much of this stuff fascinating, but don't comprehend the formulas. A lot of the scientific goes over my head, so I am not a very good judge. I do like your site, though.

I couldn't get anything to show up on the blue space other than a string of quotation marks. I'm lost on the things mentioned by Abe and Zada so it probably doesn't matter.

Ahad,

Far too elementary for my advanced brain!
Just kidding!

I have been trying to fix that blog for the past TWO YEARS, without much luck.

Myspace blogs are never easy to format properly. Easest thing would be to repost it again as a new blog, but then I would lose all those great comments that everyone left me at the bottom of the blog.

Oh well...

Put it into a new blog post and then delete the contents of the present blog post and type in "see comments to previous blog below."

I just scrolled down through the rest of the page. Lovely photos and lots of information that mostly went over my little pea brain!

Zada,
I now have a greater respect for peas.

Bless you Abe! Now we just have to help Dick with his Broccolli!!

Zada,
Picture this: Dick sitting with a cat on his lap eating a big plate of Broccolli.

Abdul,

I have cleaned up the html code for you. You will find your post here:

http://www.publishedauthors.org/Abdul-s-Blog-h30.htm

If you click on "Source" you can copy and paste the html code into your blog. You will need to reduce the size of some of the images.

Shelagh--you are a wonderment!

Shelagh,

I'm speechless. That is so superb! Thank you.



I did not want to repost the blog on myspace, because I want the Forever Friends blog to stay on top, as it's the latest thing I've been involved in.

Abe F. March wrote:

Zada,
Picture this: Dick sitting with a cat on his lap eating a big plate of Broccolli.

Add a few childen skipping merrily aound him, A Chirstmas tree with lights a flashing, Santa wiggling down the chmmney--you have pure bliss.

Ahad, I checked it out and am impressed. The amount of time and thought you have given this is immense. The links you provide at the top of the post have been disabled, however. The writing to designate areas of the boiosphere are not legible, but you have plenty of description to cover those writings, I think. At least, I got the general idea.

Abe F. March wrote:

It reminds me of the intro to Star Trek where it says something like, "To go where no man has gone before, to seek new worlds...."
Your book has given me a better insight into what you are trying to convey. I recommend it highly.

You have put this into proper perspective Abe.
This is beyond even the geniuses over on the Physics forums, because nobody has modelled such a vehicle and there are no precedents to go by.

If you were stranded in a snow storm in the middle of nowhere, with a totally white landscape all around you. Completely washed out in a blizzard, no trees, no hills... no visibility whatsoever in any direction, the only way you could gauge distances would be by holding out your arm's length in front of you or by measuring distances between your footprints in the snow. Since you're totally on your own, there is no right or wrong way of doing things.

A skyscraper built on earth can only go up to a limited height. I don't know what the figures are without checking -- but generally speaking, the taller the building, the greater the amount it will be stressed out and wobble in the buffeting winds. The vulnerability of such a skyscraper collapsing altogether to the ground, under the pull of gravity, will increase with its height. This is what I believe will happen to a gigantic 50 mile or a 100 mile radius megastructure in space -- for a given rate of rotation -- but not due to gravity or strong winds, but rather the inertial stresses.

Zada -- thank you for checkng it out

I have updated an image, looking along the length of the vehicle:

http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagent/abduls-panarama-cutdown.jpg

on this blog:

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=66837154&blogID=178580831

Courtesy of my great friend and colleague Gary Ward who is a genius on photoshop!

Wow, Ahad. That is an awesome concept.

Imagine living in that world for the next 50,000 years.

In succession of course. Those who come before you go before you. Then you come, and you too disappear. Then your child grows up and it too disppears into the soil from whence it was created. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust.

And so too, would the landscape be an ever changing phenomena. Where there were forests wildflowers and meadows, there will be lakes...and where there was hills, there'll be valleys and streams. A travel inside this world will be a travel in time, as well as in celestial distance.

Then after 2,000 generations have passed, a new civilization will be born that can do something a little different to their forefathers.

Ah-ha! That's the unwritten episodes!

Very good. I like it.

A famous mathematician once wrote:

"Why are numbers beautiful? It's like asking why is Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony beautiful. If you don't see why, someone can't tell you. I know numbers are beautiful. If they aren't beautiful, nothing is.”