| | Wikipedia Stands Corrected! | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
Dick Stodghill Five Star Member
Number of posts : 3795 Registration date : 2008-05-04 Age : 98 Location : Akron, Ohio
| Subject: Wikipedia Stands Corrected! Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:50 pm | |
| If you read the post I made earlier (Write Right - Do the Research) you will see mention of a mistake on Wikipedia. I had checked today and was certain of that. A short time ago I received an email from mystery short story writer Leigh Lundin saying, "Are you sure?" There was a link to Wikipedia so I called it up and it now was correct. For a minute I thought my eyes were deceiving me, then I caught on to the fact he had changed it after reading the blog. He also had a couple of links quoting from the blog. So, as you probably have been warned before, don't believe everything you see on Wikipedia. It may be different the next time you check. |
| | | Gina Three Star Member
Number of posts : 136 Registration date : 2008-10-03 Age : 54
| Subject: Re: Wikipedia Stands Corrected! Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:58 pm | |
| The Wiki 'Utamaro' page is full of errors. I wouldn't be able to correct it without rewriting it. A lot of the pages are a patchwork of different people's views that aren't even vaguely similar. And the images that are supposedly in the public domain ain't necessarily so. |
| | | RetiredName Four Star Member
Number of posts : 859 Registration date : 2008-12-29 Age : 55 Location : The Hub of the Universe
| Subject: Re: Wikipedia Stands Corrected! Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:08 pm | |
| I always take Wikipedia with a giant grain of salt. Some of it is quite good, some of it...well, not so good. |
| | | zadaconnaway Five Star Member
Number of posts : 4017 Registration date : 2008-01-16 Age : 76 Location : Washington, USA
| Subject: Re: Wikipedia Stands Corrected! Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:10 pm | |
| Well, hello Mr. Turkel. Nice to see your face! |
| | | flashgordon Four Star Member
Number of posts : 241 Registration date : 2008-01-11
| Subject: Re: Wikipedia Stands Corrected! Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:23 am | |
| Wikipedia is great. According to studies, it is usually 80% correct, depending on the entry. I edit entries all the time when I find mistakes. |
| | | Dick Stodghill Five Star Member
Number of posts : 3795 Registration date : 2008-05-04 Age : 98 Location : Akron, Ohio
| Subject: Re: Wikipedia Stands Corrected! Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:35 am | |
| |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Wikipedia Stands Corrected! | |
| |
| | | | Wikipedia Stands Corrected! | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| Latest topics | » Current events - world viewSun Apr 24, 2022 8:53 am by Abe F. March » Status of forumTue Oct 26, 2021 11:33 pm by Abe F. March » RSS-feed Directory of best Free Marketing TipsMon Jun 21, 2021 4:06 am by ryanerwindm » Alice Shumate CrookerSun Jun 20, 2021 2:31 pm by Shelagh » Alice Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:12 pm by Abe F. March » Activity on the forumFri Mar 12, 2021 10:31 pm by Abe F. March » Call it begins Fri Mar 12, 2021 6:41 pm by Ierus » Merry ChristmasTue Dec 22, 2020 11:04 am by Abe F. March » Climate ChangeMon Sep 21, 2020 12:02 am by Abe F. March » Animal charactersSat Jul 11, 2020 12:01 pm by Abe F. March » VirusSun Jun 28, 2020 7:59 am by Abe F. March » Just an observationSun May 31, 2020 3:10 pm by Shelagh » DebtSun May 24, 2020 5:42 am by Abe F. March » Still activeMon Feb 24, 2020 9:42 am by Shelagh » best fantasy books?Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:26 am by cpena |
Published Authors on Twitter |
|
|