Published Authors

A place for budding and experienced authors to share ideas about publishing and marketing books
 
HomeHome  GalleryGallery  Latest imagesLatest images  RegisterRegister  Log in  Featured MembersFeatured Members  ArticlesArticles  

 

 DNA proves skeletal remains to be Richard III of England

Go down 
AuthorMessage
alj
Five Star Member
Five Star Member
alj


Number of posts : 9633
Registration date : 2008-12-05
Age : 80
Location : San Antonio

DNA proves skeletal remains to be Richard III of England Empty
PostSubject: DNA proves skeletal remains to be Richard III of England   DNA proves skeletal remains to be Richard III of England EmptyTue Feb 05, 2013 10:30 am

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/remains-of-king-richard-iii-identified/2013/02/04/d79e87b2-6ebb-11e2-ac36-3d8d9dcaa2e2_story.html

Quote :
The verification came after scientific tests were used to match DNA samples taken from Canadian-born Michael Ibsen, a direct descendent of Anne of York, Richard’s elder sister....

Richard III’s grave, which was found underneath the Leicester site in the remains of Greyfriars friary, had been lost during the religious reforms of Henry VIII. Richard, the last king of England to fall on the battlefield, was slain in the 1485 Battle of Bosworth Field while defending his crown against the raiding upstart, Henry VII. He was famously depicted in Shakespeare’s “Richard III” crying out before his death: “A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse!”....

Richard III supporters such as Philippa Langley, a screenwriter and member of the Richard III Society, were driven to find the lost king’s remains by a desire to reopen the debate over his place in history. Experts say that most of what is known today about the medieval king is largely “propaganda” of the Tudor monarchs who followed him.....

From the time the bones were found, there was strong evidence to suggest the remains belonged to the monarch. The skeleton indicated a personage who was well nourished, who had suffered cranial trauma during battle and who exhibited spine damage from scoliosis, a type of curvature of the spine — all signs that pointed to Richard III.

I am somewhat curious as to how the finding can prove or disprove the negative image. Shakepeare obviously believed it - or was perhaps one of those "media giants" who twisted history in favor of the ruling elite.

At any rate, The Shakespeare play, Henry VI, Part II, was the basis for my own projections in The Ballad of Jack Cade, written for the novel, And Adam was a Gardener, back in the late 80's, which had as one of it's themes, the natural equality of all people vs the negative effects of greedy despots and their political leaders.

15th century portrait of Richard III:

DNA proves skeletal remains to be Richard III of England King_Richard_III__1666500a
http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/topic/86007-richard-iii-bones-confirmed/page__st__60

and reconstruction from skull:

DNA proves skeletal remains to be Richard III of England Article-2273703-175BA56C000005DC-809_306x388


We hardly needed the DNA evidence.
Back to top Go down
http://www.annjoiner.com
 
DNA proves skeletal remains to be Richard III of England
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Today proves we've come a long way since 1952
» Home in England
» Manchester, England Viictims
» Crop Circles are not exclusive to England
» Made in England Do you think this will stop drunk drivers ?

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Published Authors :: Society :: Current Events-
Jump to: